Commit Graph
88 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 741f12afaf fix(prd-7): M5 code quality review — remove dead re-exports, verify type safety
- Removed unused re-exports (CommentUpdateInput, ExecutionDetails,
  ensureProperlyEncodedUrl) from forgejo/comment-logic.ts
- Verified no `any` type escapes in Forgejo-specific code
- Confirmed naming conventions consistent with upstream
- No dead code, unused imports, or unreachable branches
- All complex decisions documented with comments
- Typecheck, format, and 834 tests pass clean

Progress: 83% complete — M6 (documentation accuracy) remaining

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 12:57:25 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 bbfd630fc5 fix(prd-7): M4 test coverage review — 28 new tests for comment operations and branch setup
- test/create-initial-comment.test.ts: 15 tests covering GitHub/Forgejo
  platform branches, sticky comment matching, review comment fallback,
  error handling with GITHUB_OUTPUT verification
- test/update-tracking-comment.test.ts: 11 tests covering body construction,
  branch link logic (issue vs PR), comment type routing, Forgejo URLs
- test/setup-branch-forgejo.test.ts: 2 tests verifying Forgejo uses
  repos.getBranch() while GitHub uses git.getRef() for source branch SHA
- test/COVERAGE-NOTES.md: documents all coverage status and accepted gaps
  (tag mode orchestrator, entrypoint) with rationale
- Notable finding: CLAUDE_APP_BOT_ID discrepancy flagged for M5

Progress: 67% complete (4/6 milestones) — M5 code quality next

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 12:51:08 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 6b0302d226 fix(prd-7): M3 security review — self-trigger guard, actor permissions, trigger bypass, platform validation
- Add self-mention/bot loop prevention in actor.ts (blocks actor matching bot_name)
- Switch Forgejo permission check to actor-level via getCollaboratorPermissionLevel
  with fallback to token-level repos.get() when collaborator API returns 403
- Close empty-body PR review comment trigger bypass (now returns false instead of true)
- Add platform detection cross-validation (reject PLATFORM=forgejo on github.com)
- Document URL builder defense-in-depth rationale in comment-logic.ts
- Update/add tests across 6 test files (actor, permissions, trigger, platform, mcp, m7)

Progress: 50% complete (3/6 milestones) — next: M4 test coverage review

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 12:31:12 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 cefc229199 fix(prd-7): M2 error handling review — fix process.exit bypasses, TOCTOU gap, URL consistency
- F1: Replace process.exit(1) with throw in branch.ts (cleanup was bypassed)
- F2: Replace process.exit(1) with throw in install-mcp-server.ts (same issue)
- F2b: Replace process.exit(1) with throw in create-prompt/index.ts (same issue)
- F3: Use getServerUrl() instead of GITHUB_SERVER_URL constant in branch-cleanup.ts
- F4: Use updated_at for review TOCTOU filtering in Forgejo data fetcher
- Accepted notes: no pagination >100, no retry, unconditional trigger, image no-op

Progress: 33% complete — M2 done, M3 (security review) next

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 12:16:22 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 ac58fb6c14 fix(prd-7): M1 architecture review — consolidate duplication, fix bugs, memoize detection
- F1: Consolidated updateForgejoCommentBody into unified updateCommentBody (~150 lines removed)
- F2: Fixed wrong run identifier in update-with-branch.ts (context.runId → getForgejoRunIndex())
- F3: Memoized detectPlatform() with _resetPlatformCache() for tests
- F4: Added getServerUrl() runtime helper to resolve constant-vs-function inconsistency
- F5: Fixed sticky comment bot matching on Forgejo via context.inputs.botName
- F6: Documented GHES heuristic misidentification in docs/forgejo.md
- Updated PRD M1 checkbox to complete

Progress: 17% complete — M1 done, M2 (error handling review) next

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 12:09:02 +02:00
Vlad Mocanu ae326659b1 Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' 2026-02-26 11:36:32 +02:00
Vlad Mocanu eee75baa45 Merge pull request 'feat(prd-6): E2E test and fix all untested Forgejo trigger scenarios' (#15) from feature/prd-6-m2-test-pr-review-comment into main 2026-02-26 09:33:15 +00:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 57353f9eb9 docs(prd-6): archive completed PRD to prds/done/
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 11:32:53 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 4a30b9819e docs(prd-6): mark M7 complete — documentation updated with full E2E results
- Updated docs/forgejo.md E2E table with all 5 validated trigger scenarios
- Added "Webhook & Event Differences" section (12-row comparison table)
- Added 4 new Known Limitations and 5 new Troubleshooting entries
- Removed "Not Yet E2E Tested" section — all triggers validated
- PRD #6 is 100% complete (all 7 milestones done)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 11:32:53 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 ccac5aff1e docs(prd-6): mark M6 complete — tag mode with code changes validated
- Branch creation, commit push, bot attribution all verified (run #198)
- 1 bug found: prompt template used quick_pull=1 instead of expand=1
- Fix committed in f08b1b4, validates after merge to main

Progress: 87% complete — M7 (docs update) remaining

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 11:32:53 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 2acaece6ae fix: use expand=1 instead of quick_pull=1 in PR URL on Forgejo
The prompt template hardcoded quick_pull=1 (GitHub-specific) in the
"Create a PR" URL. On Forgejo, this parameter is ignored so the
compare page doesn't auto-expand the PR creation form. Forgejo uses
expand=1 for this purpose.

Since Claude writes the PR URL into the comment body, and
updateForgejoCommentBody() extracts it (prLinkFromContent) with
priority over the URL generated by update-comment-link.ts, the
prompt template is the correct place to fix this.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 11:32:53 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 f83eed97de docs: document Forgejo event behavior in workflow and trigger.ts
Add inline comments explaining:
- Forgejo never fires pull_request_review (sends pull_request_comment)
- Why workflow if-condition cannot gate on @claude for these events
  (payload fields are empty, confirmed by run 12084 being skipped)
- The @claude check is handled in trigger.ts via payload inspection

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 11:32:36 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 a033ec873e revert: undo workflow if-condition gating for pull_request_comment
Forgejo's pull_request_comment payload does not populate
github.event.comment.body or github.event.review.body in a way
the workflow contains() expression can read, causing legitimate
@claude reviews to be skipped (run 12084).

Revert to unconditional pass at the workflow level. The @claude
check is handled properly in trigger.ts which inspects the actual
payload fields with fallback logic.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 11:32:36 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 42f6508d49 fix: gate Forgejo review/comment triggers on @claude mention
Previously, all pull_request_comment events on Forgejo triggered the
full Claude pipeline unconditionally — both in the workflow if-condition
and in trigger.ts. This wasted CI resources and API credits on reviews
without @claude mentions (e.g. plain "LGTM" reviews).

Workflow: add @claude check via contains() on comment.body and review.body.
Trigger validation: replace blind auto-trigger with payload-aware check
that inspects available body fields, falling back only when no body exists.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 11:32:36 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 8754cc0181 docs(prd-6): mark M5 complete — assignee trigger validated
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:49:39 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 99624efacc fix: fall back to issue.assignee on Forgejo for assignee trigger
Forgejo's issues/assigned webhook payload doesn't include a top-level
assignee object. The assignee is only available under issue.assignee.
Fall back to that field when payload.assignee is missing.

Also removes M5 debug logging.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:47:30 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 001072c05c debug: add issue.assignee/assignees logging for M5
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:46:25 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 9efd06cc26 debug: add M5 debug logging for assignee trigger
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:15 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 efddd08f5c docs(prd-6): mark M4 complete — label trigger validated
3 bugs found and fixed:
- Workflow if: expression parser rejects # comments
- Forgejo doesn't populate github.event.action in if: context
- Forgejo sends 'label_updated' instead of 'labeled'

Key learning: normalize Forgejo event action names in context.ts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:15 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 f3c92a2821 fix: move comments out of workflow if: expression block
Forgejo runner's expression parser rejects '#' characters inside
if: | blocks (run 52778: "unexpected character '#' while lexing
expression"). Move all comments above the if: key and switch from
block scalar (|) to folded scalar (>-) to avoid multiline issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:15 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 1748a2c3df docs(prd-6): mark M3 complete — PR review trigger validated
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:09 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 401c35fdd2 docs: document Forgejo event behavior in workflow and trigger.ts
Add inline comments explaining:
- Forgejo never fires pull_request_review (sends pull_request_comment)
- Why workflow if-condition cannot gate on @claude for these events
  (payload fields are empty, confirmed by run 12084 being skipped)
- The @claude check is handled in trigger.ts via payload inspection

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:09 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 231a31ca39 revert: undo workflow if-condition gating for pull_request_comment
Forgejo's pull_request_comment payload does not populate
github.event.comment.body or github.event.review.body in a way
the workflow contains() expression can read, causing legitimate
@claude reviews to be skipped (run 12084).

Revert to unconditional pass at the workflow level. The @claude
check is handled properly in trigger.ts which inspects the actual
payload fields with fallback logic.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:09 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 71fb686885 fix: gate Forgejo review/comment triggers on @claude mention
Previously, all pull_request_comment events on Forgejo triggered the
full Claude pipeline unconditionally — both in the workflow if-condition
and in trigger.ts. This wasted CI resources and API credits on reviews
without @claude mentions (e.g. plain "LGTM" reviews).

Workflow: add @claude check via contains() on comment.body and review.body.
Trigger validation: replace blind auto-trigger with payload-aware check
that inspects available body fields, falling back only when no body exists.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:09 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 d9c22ffe50 docs(prd-6): mark M2 complete — PR review comment trigger validated
E2E test confirmed: Claude correctly responds to @claude mentions in
PR review comments on Forgejo (run #12075, PR #15). Three bugs were
found and fixed during validation:
1. Missing comment object in Forgejo webhook payload
2. Event name mismatch (pull_request_comment vs pull_request_review_comment)
3. MCP server routing updates to wrong API (critical — silently dropped responses)

Progress: 3/8 milestones complete (37.5%)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:09 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 84cf34ff1f fix: route Forgejo review comment updates to issue comment API
On Forgejo, the tracking comment for pull_request_review_comment events
is always created as a regular issue comment (because Forgejo's webhook
payload lacks the top-level comment object). The MCP server was
incorrectly setting isPullRequestReviewComment=true based on the event
name, causing every update to try pulls.updateReviewComment first —
which 404'd and silently swallowed Claude's responses.

Three fixes:
- MCP server: detect Forgejo and always use issue comment path
- update-comment-link: skip pulls.getReviewComment on Forgejo (saves
  one wasted 404 API call)
- update-claude-comment: expand fallback to also catch 422 (defense
  in depth for Forgejo edge cases)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:09 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 821cc86c6e docs(prd-6): mark M1.5 resolved — CI confirmed green
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:09 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 2f44e40942 fix: remove all image-downloader mocking from forgejo-data-fetcher test
Both mock.module and spyOn cause cross-file test pollution in Bun's
single-process runner — mock.module poisons the module registry permanently,
and spyOn doesn't correctly restore ESM live bindings across files on Linux.

The real downloadCommentImages is safe to call because test comment bodies
contain no GitHub image URLs, so the function finds zero images and returns
an empty Map naturally. The only side effect is mkdir("/tmp/github-images")
which is harmless on CI runners.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:09 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 ede18897b0 docs(prd-6): mark M1.5 resolved, document root cause and fix
Root cause was mock.module cross-file pollution in Bun's test runner,
not Linux-specific mock tracking bugs as previously theorized.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:09 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 ac9e9cddff fix: replace mock.module with spyOn to stop cross-file test pollution
mock.module("image-downloader") in forgejo-data-fetcher.test.ts replaced
the module in Bun's registry globally for the entire process. When Bun's
non-deterministic file ordering ran this file BEFORE image-downloader.test.ts,
the image-downloader tests imported a stubbed module instead of the real one,
breaking all 18 tests. This was the root cause of the CI failures that
persisted through 5 previous fix attempts.

spyOn patches the live module export per-test and is auto-restored by Bun
after each test — no cross-file pollution regardless of execution order.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:09 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 a544d710e5 test: remove diagnostic file that broke typecheck
The DI fix for image-downloader tests passed on CI (all 18 tests
green). Removing the temporary mock tracking diagnostic file whose
type errors caused the typecheck job to fail.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:09 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 7011b0f71a test: add mock tracking diagnostics for Forgejo CI debugging
DI fix passes locally in grunt-runner Docker but still fails on
actual Forgejo runner. Adding diagnostic tests to isolate whether
mock() tracking itself is broken, or something else in the runner
environment causes it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:09 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 a6b3c94004 fix: use dependency injection for image-downloader fs mocks
mock.module("fs/promises") on Linux Bun poisons the entire mock
tracking system — not just fs mocks, but ALL mock/spy assertions
(octokit mocks, spyOn(global, "fetch"), etc.) stop recording calls.

Replace with dependency injection: downloadCommentImages() now accepts
an optional fsDeps parameter. Tests pass mock mkdir/writeFile directly.
Production callers omit it and get real fs. No mock.module anywhere.

Fixes 18 test failures blocking CI on Forgejo Linux runners.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:45:08 +02:00
Vlad Mocanu 6113a4ef2d test: add M2 E2E test marker for PR review comment trigger 2026-02-26 10:45:08 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 3cd73bccde revert: remove label check from opened events to prevent duplicates
Forgejo fires both issues/opened AND issues/label_updated when an
issue is created with a label. Having the label check on opened
caused duplicate Claude runs. Remove it — the label_updated event
handles label triggers correctly now that the workflow gate and
action normalization are fixed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:30:47 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 1feec26c2e feat: check trigger label on issue opened events
When an issue is created with the trigger label already applied,
Forgejo only fires issues/opened (not a separate labeled event).
Check payload.issue.labels for the trigger label during opened
events so creating an issue with the claude label works in one step.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:29:05 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 b37009b766 cleanup: remove M4 debug logging from run.ts
Debug logging confirmed Forgejo sends 'label_updated' as eventAction
for issues/labeled events. Normalization fix in context.ts handles it.
Remove temporary debug lines.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:27:59 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 baa007a3ec fix: normalize Forgejo 'label_updated' to 'labeled' in context
Forgejo sends eventAction 'label_updated' instead of 'labeled' for
issue label events. Add FORGEJO_EVENT_ACTION_MAP in context.ts to
normalize at parse time (same pattern as event name normalization),
so all downstream code (trigger.ts, create-prompt) works unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:25:58 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 fa0070ddcc fix: accept Forgejo 'label_updated' action for label triggers
Forgejo sends eventAction 'label_updated' instead of 'labeled'
for issue label events (discovered via debug logging, run 52786).
Accept both values in trigger.ts label check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:24:01 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 b020426956 debug: add issues event payload logging for M4 label trigger
Temporary debug logging to inspect eventAction and payload.label
on Forgejo for issues/labeled events.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:22:57 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 a864b1636f fix: move comments out of workflow if: expression block
Forgejo runner's expression parser rejects '#' characters inside
if: | blocks (run 52778: "unexpected character '#' while lexing
expression"). Move all comments above the if: key and switch from
block scalar (|) to folded scalar (>-) to avoid multiline issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:21:23 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 414c7053eb fix: let all issues events through workflow gate on Forgejo
Forgejo does not populate github.event.action in the workflow if:
context for issues events (run 12061 was skipped despite action
being 'labeled'). Same pattern as pull_request_comment (M3).

Remove the action/body/title gating from the workflow condition
and let trigger.ts handle all validation (label, assignee, mention).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 10:19:39 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 dab92ef0eb fix: use mock.module for image-downloader tests
Replace the _fsForTest/DI patterns with Bun's native mock.module() API.
This mocks fs/promises at the module loader level, which works reliably
on Linux where jest.fn() call tracking fails cross-module. The source
code is now clean with no testing artifacts.

Also switches from jest.fn() to mock() (Bun's native API) for Octokit
mocks in these tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 09:05:39 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 cff360d00a fix: use dependency injection for image-downloader fs mocks
The _fsForTest mutable object pattern fails on Linux Bun because
test and source files get different module instances. Switch to
passing fs operations as an optional parameter with defaults.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 08:54:58 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 ac8e22e2f8 fix: fall through to issue comment when PR review comment fetch 404s
On Forgejo, pull_request_review_comment events create the tracking
comment as a regular issue comment (because the payload lacks
comment.id for reply-to-review). The update-comment-link step then
tried pulls.getReviewComment() first, which 404'd and threw before
reaching the issues.getComment() fallback.

Wrap the PR review comment fetch in its own try/catch so it falls
through to the issue comment fetch on failure.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 08:49:26 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 910c843122 chore: remove debug-event job, merge into failure step
The separate debug-event job ran on every event, wasting a runner.
Merged the event payload dump into the existing "Debug on failure"
step so it only runs when the claude job actually fails.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 08:43:57 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 e73c881c64 fix: skip commentBody validation for Forgejo review comment events
Forgejo's pull_request_review_comment payload doesn't include the
comment body. The Forgejo data fetcher retrieves it via REST instead.
Skip the COMMENT_BODY required check on Forgejo to avoid crashing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 08:42:22 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 9d8c96f01e fix: handle missing comment payload in Forgejo pull_request_review_comment
Forgejo's pull_request_review_comment event does NOT include a top-level
`comment` object in the webhook payload. This caused crashes at:
- create-initial.ts: context.payload.comment.id (for reply-to-review)
- fetcher.ts: context.payload.comment.created_at (for trigger timestamp)

Fix: use optional chaining and fall back gracefully — reply-to-review
becomes a regular issue comment, trigger timestamp returns undefined.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-26 08:39:48 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 a10b0475c0 fix: handle missing comment payload in Forgejo review comment events
Forgejo's pull_request_review_comment event does not include a
top-level `comment` object in the payload (it's undefined), causing
a crash: "undefined is not an object (evaluating 'context.payload.comment.body')".

- trigger.ts: On Forgejo, always trigger for pull_request_review_comment
  events since the workflow already gates on event name alone
- create-prompt/index.ts: Use optional chaining for comment fields,
  fall back to actor/empty values (data fetcher provides full data)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 23:53:19 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 b4bc36810d fix: let pull_request_review_comment events through unconditionally
Forgejo's pull_request_review_comment event does not populate
github.event.comment.body in the workflow context (it's always
empty), so the contains() check never matches. The action code
does its own trigger phrase validation, so it's safe to let these
events through based on event name alone.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 23:49:19 +02:00
Vlad Mocanu 2ff7e35b48 chore: trigger workflow cache refresh for debug job 2026-02-25 23:48:10 +02:00
Vlad Mocanu 97dd0863c7 chore: improve debug-event job payload dump [skip ci] 2026-02-25 23:47:04 +02:00
Vlad Mocanu a129a15f61 feat(prd-6): verify workflow triggers and add assignee_trigger (#13) 2026-02-25 21:43:37 +00:00
Vlad Mocanu 095c2c2429 Merge pull request 'docs: rename bot from claude-bot to claude in CI and docs' (#12) from claude/issue-11-20260225-2020 into main
Reviewed-on: https://git.wxs.ro/actions/claude-code-action/pulls/12
2026-02-25 20:37:35 +00:00
Vlad Mocanu 3bab2edc41 fix: build image URL regexes at call time, not module load time 2026-02-25 19:26:18 +00:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 2f7d0a7fb2 docs(prd-5): mark complete and archive to prds/done/ [skip ci]
- All milestones delivered, E2E validated on PR #8
- Deferred: commit authorship E2E, cross-repo test

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 21:11:20 +02:00
Vlad Mocanu 40731a0f5d Merge pull request 'feat: add dedicated claude-bot user for Forgejo (PRD #5)' (#8) from feature/prd-5-dedicated-forgejo-user into main 2026-02-25 19:07:49 +00:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 23f15aecb9 fix: use GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER for Forgejo job URLs and pin Bun version in CI
Forgejo uses the per-repo sequential run index (GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER) in
action URLs, not the internal DB run ID (GITHUB_RUN_ID). This caused
"View job" links to return 404. Fixed in all 4 URL construction sites:
create-initial comment, update-comment-link, and both prompt generators.

Also pins Bun to 1.2.21 in CI — Bun 1.3.9 broke spyOn(fs, ...) which
failed 18 upstream image-downloader tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 21:07:40 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 6ebfb4914f docs: replace instance-specific values with placeholders in forgejo.md
Replace hardcoded bot_id "48" and bot_email "claude@wxs.ro" with
generic placeholders in Quick Start and setup examples so readers
don't copy instance-specific values.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 20:56:55 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 b03ccb518c feat(prd-5): add dedicated claude-bot user for Forgejo
- Add bot_email action input for custom git commit email on Forgejo
- Update claude.yml to use CLAUDE_BOT_TOKEN with bot_id/bot_name/bot_email
- Update git-config.ts to use provided email over noreply format
- Add "Dedicated Bot User" setup guide to docs/forgejo.md
- Update CLAUDE.md with bot identity documentation

Infrastructure (done outside code):
- claude-bot user created (ID 48, non-admin, with avatar)
- Claude team with write access in all 12 orgs
- CLAUDE_BOT_TOKEN org-level secret in all 12 orgs

Progress: ~85% complete - pending E2E validation after merge

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 20:56:55 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 07e0384538 docs: replace instance-specific values with placeholders in forgejo.md
Replace hardcoded bot_id "48" and bot_email "claude@wxs.ro" with
generic placeholders in Quick Start and setup examples so readers
don't copy instance-specific values.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 20:56:37 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 b4a6c34853 fix: use per-review comment fetching for Forgejo compatibility
Forgejo doesn't have the flat GET /pulls/{number}/comments endpoint
(returns 404). Replace pulls.listReviewComments() with a 2-phase
approach: fetch reviews first, then pulls.listCommentsForReview()
per-review in parallel. Updates tests to mock the new per-review API.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 20:52:25 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 efe30422e7 ci: switch claude.yml to use claude-bot token [skip ci]
Use CLAUDE_BOT_TOKEN (dedicated bot user) instead of FORGEJO_CLAUDE_TOKEN
(personal token). Comments and commits will now appear as claude-bot.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 20:45:11 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 34c259f189 docs(prd): create PRDs #5, #6, #7 for Forgejo hardening [skip ci]
- PRD #5: Dedicated Forgejo user for Claude bot (dedicated identity, scoped token)
- PRD #6: E2E test all 5 untested Forgejo trigger scenarios
- PRD #7: Senior developer review of all Forgejo platform support code
- Defined 5, 7, and 6 milestones respectively
- All three can be parallelized (#7 is read-only, runs alongside #5)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 20:13:57 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 54c2d5b3e8 docs: add branch.ts platform fix to CLAUDE.md
- Add branch.ts to key integration points (repos.getBranch on Forgejo)
- Add claude.yml to CI workflows list

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 20:07:24 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 c88782bd20 docs: update Forgejo docs with tag mode E2E results
- Add E2E Test Results section with validated capabilities
- Document git ref API difference (refs vs ref) in Known Limitations
- Document user display name 403 fallback
- Add git ref lookup row to API differences table
- Add claude.yml workflow to CI workflows section
- Remove outdated "not yet E2E tested" note from tag mode

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 20:06:47 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 87b7fec838 fix: use repos.getBranch() on Forgejo for branch SHA lookup
Forgejo uses /git/refs (plural) not /git/ref (singular), causing
git.getRef() to 404. Use repos.getBranch() on Forgejo instead,
which returns the same SHA data via a compatible endpoint.

Also adds the tag mode workflow (.forgejo/workflows/claude.yml)
for @claude mentions on issues, PR reviews, and label triggers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 20:02:24 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 c2ea0a6dba feat: add tag mode workflow for Forgejo
Enables @claude mentions on issues, PR review comments,
issue assignment, and label triggers on Forgejo.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 20:00:26 +02:00
Vlad Mocanu ef8657f2de Merge pull request 'feat(prd-1): Forgejo platform support' (#3) from feature/prd-1-forgejo-platform-support into main 2026-02-25 17:58:17 +00:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 bed5cd03c2 docs(prd-1): move completed PRD to prds/done/
PRD #1 (Forgejo Platform Support) is 100% complete.
All milestones M1-M9 implemented and validated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 19:56:02 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 44f598ff11 feat(prd-1): complete M9 - documentation & upstream merge validation
- Created docs/forgejo.md: comprehensive setup guide (prerequisites,
  quick start, platform detection, GitHub differences, CI workflows,
  upstream merge process, known limitations, troubleshooting)
- Updated README.md with Forgejo support mention and docs link
- Updated CLAUDE.md with Forgejo architecture section
- Added platform input to docs/usage.md inputs table
- Added 5 Forgejo FAQ entries to docs/faq.md
- Upstream merge validated: zero conflicts (based on latest upstream)
- PRD #1 100% complete: all milestones M1-M9 done, 794 tests passing

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 19:55:25 +02:00
Vlad Mocanu 5daed4f9bf feat(prd-1): complete M8 - E2E testing on Forgejo
- Mark M8 as complete: agent mode E2E passes on Forgejo runner
- Update actor.ts table entry: skipped on Forgejo (read:user scope)
- Mark setup-bun risk as RESOLVED (replaced with curl install)
- Document M8 fixes: permission check, actor skip, curl bun, CI env

Progress: 89% complete - M9 (docs + upstream merge validation) remaining
2026-02-25 19:49:46 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 f93e8a10d0 fix(prd-1): skip actor check on Forgejo + replace setup-bun with curl install
- Skip checkHumanActor on Forgejo (no bot accounts, avoids read:user scope)
- Replace oven-sh/setup-bun action with curl install in action.yml
  (Forgejo runner pre-fetches all uses: refs even when if: skips them)
- Mirror oven-sh/setup-bun created at xternal/setup-bun for future use

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 19:45:47 +02:00
Vlad Mocanu ead98f44f9 fix(prd-1): skip actor check on Forgejo (no bot accounts, avoids read:user scope) 2026-02-25 19:40:24 +02:00
Vlad Mocanu 6eb2e41510 fix(prd-1): remove debug output from CI test step 2026-02-25 18:54:24 +02:00
Vlad Mocanu 9be00086b9 debug(prd-1): add GITHUB_SERVER_URL debug output to CI test step 2026-02-25 18:51:27 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 c9a6c56790 fix(prd-1): inline GITHUB_SERVER_URL export in CI test step
Forgejo runner re-injects GITHUB_SERVER_URL after step-level env is
set, so the env: key approach doesn't override it. Using inline export
in the run command ensures the override takes effect before bun loads
modules (config.ts module-level constants read process.env at import).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 18:43:40 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 638645b8af fix(prd-1): handle undefined actor type on Forgejo
Forgejo's user API doesn't return a `type` field (GitHub returns
"User" or "Bot"). The undefined type was incorrectly treated as
non-human, blocking all Forgejo workflows. Now treat undefined/empty
type as human — Forgejo doesn't have GitHub-style bot accounts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 18:41:14 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 e26d08e666 fix(prd-1): fix CI test failures and Forgejo permission check
Two issues found during M8 E2E testing on Forgejo:

1. CI test failures (31 tests): Unit tests assume GitHub context but
   Forgejo runner sets GITHUB_SERVER_URL=git.wxs.ro, causing
   detectPlatform() to return "forgejo" and module-level constants in
   config.ts to use Forgejo URLs. Fixed by setting GITHUB_SERVER_URL
   in the test step env. Forgejo-specific tests already override with
   PLATFORM=forgejo in their beforeEach.

2. Permission check 403: Forgejo's getCollaboratorPermissionLevel
   requires admin access. Added checkForgejoPermissions() that uses
   GET /repos/{owner}/{repo} instead — returns a permissions object
   with { admin, push, pull } booleans for the authenticated token.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 18:39:18 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 c61073da42 feat(prd-1): implement M3 - Forgejo CI workflows
- ci.yml: 3-job CI (test, prettier, typecheck) on grunt runner
- test-action.yml: agent-mode self-test (weekly + PR path triggers)
- upstream-sync.yml: weekly upstream check with labeled issue dedup
- Updated PRD checkboxes for M3 completion

Progress: 78% complete (7/9 milestones) - M8 (e2e testing) next

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 18:29:47 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 88401255be feat(prd-1): implement M7 - entry point + mode handler integration
- Tag mode routes to fetchForgejoData vs fetchGitHubData based on platform
- createInitialComment auto-detects platform for Forgejo spinner/URL format
- update-comment-link uses updateForgejoCommentBody + Forgejo PR compare URL
- update-with-branch uses platform-aware branch/job-run link formatting
- Agent mode needed NO changes (token in run.ts, rest uses Octokit REST)
- 11 new integration tests in test/m7-integration.test.ts
- 785 tests pass, typecheck clean, format clean

Progress: 78% complete (7/9 milestones) - M3, M8, M9 remaining

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 18:22:27 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 ce1459fe7f feat(prd-1): implement M6 - MCP server platform routing
- Add platform detection to prepareMcpConfig() via detectPlatform()
- Skip GitHub public MCP server (ghcr.io/github/github-mcp-server) on Forgejo
- Skip checkActionsReadPermission on Forgejo (workflow token has full access)
- Reuse existing github-actions-server.ts for both platforms (no duplication)
- Add 6 Forgejo-specific tests to install-mcp-server.test.ts
- Updated PRD checkboxes for M6

Progress: 67% complete (6/9 milestones) - M7 now unblocked

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 17:57:35 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 0802ac18eb feat(prd-1): implement M5 - Forgejo comment URL formatting
- Create src/forgejo/comment-logic.ts with Forgejo-specific URL builders:
  - Unicode spinner (replaces GitHub CDN image)
  - PR compare URL with expand=1 (no quick_pull=1)
  - Dynamic extractOwnerRepoFromUrl() fixing hardcoded github.com regex
  - updateForgejoCommentBody() with cross-platform URL extraction
- 41 tests covering all URL patterns, spinner, and the critical regex fix
- No upstream files modified (lean adapter approach)

Progress: 56% complete (5/9) - next: M6 (MCP server platform routing)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 17:48:16 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 4b0737c54c feat(prd-1): implement M4b - Forgejo REST comment/review fetching
- Add 3 REST calls to Promise.all for PRs (listComments, listReviews,
  listReviewComments) and 1 for issues (listComments)
- Add mapping helpers: mapRestComments, mapRestReviewComments,
  mapRestReviews (groups inline comments by pull_request_review_id)
- Import and apply TOCTOU filtering (filterCommentsToTriggerTime,
  filterReviewsToTriggerTime) and actor filtering from GitHub fetcher
- Add image processing pipeline via downloadCommentImages (no-op on
  Forgejo due to URL pattern mismatch, architecturally correct)
- Deep-clone reviews before filtering to preserve contextData immutability
- Update test suite: 51 tests covering mapping helpers, full fetch
  flow, TOCTOU filtering, actor filtering, and contextData immutability
- Updated PRD checkboxes for M4b completion

Progress: 44% complete (4/9 milestones) - next: M5 or M3

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 17:00:13 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 6e104a33dc feat(prd-1): implement M4a - Forgejo REST data fetching (PR/issue basics)
- Add src/forgejo/data/fetcher.ts: REST-based data fetcher replacing
  GraphQL queries with parallel Octokit REST calls (PR details + files
  + commits via Promise.all, issue details, file status mapping, SHA
  computation, TOCTOU title/body protection, user display name)
- Add test/forgejo-data-fetcher.test.ts with 31 test cases covering
  field mapping, parallel fetch, null handling, and edge cases
- Output matches FetchDataResult type for downstream compatibility
- Comments/reviews left empty (M4b scope)

Progress: 33% complete (M1, M2, M4a done) - next: M4b or M5

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 16:19:09 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 385acacc32 feat(prd-1): implement M2 - Forgejo token handling
- Add src/forgejo/token.ts: synchronous token handler that returns
  OVERRIDE_GITHUB_TOKEN or DEFAULT_WORKFLOW_TOKEN directly (no OIDC)
- Wire platform-aware token setup into run.ts with early branch
  before existing setupGitHubToken() call
- Add test/forgejo-token.test.ts with 8 test cases covering
  override precedence, default fallback, and error handling
- GitHub token path remains completely unchanged

Progress: 22% complete (M1, M2 done) - next: M3 (CI workflows) or M5 (comment URLs)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 16:10:00 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 72f11f320c feat(prd-1): implement M1 - platform detection and action.yml modifications
- Add src/platform/detector.ts with 3-tier detection (explicit input,
  FORGEJO env var, GITHUB_SERVER_URL heuristic)
- Add 'platform' input to action.yml (auto/github/forgejo)
- Add 'Detect Platform' shell step as first composite action step
- Split bun installation: oven-sh/setup-bun for GitHub, curl fallback
  for Forgejo runners
- Condition 'Revoke app token' step to skip on Forgejo
- Pass resolved PLATFORM env var to run step
- Add 14 unit tests covering all detection paths

Progress: M1 complete (1/9 milestones) - M2 and M5 now unblocked

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 16:03:51 +02:00
Vlad MocanuandClaude Opus 4.6 411eb3d69d docs(prd-1): create PRD #1 - Forgejo platform support [skip ci]
- Lean adapter architecture: ~8 new files, reuse existing Octokit REST code
- REST-based data fetching to replace GitHub GraphQL queries
- Platform detection via explicit input + env-var auto-detection
- Custom Forgejo CI workflows with action self-test
- 10 milestones across 4 phases

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 15:54:10 +02:00