fix: gate Forgejo review/comment triggers on @claude mention

Previously, all pull_request_comment events on Forgejo triggered the
full Claude pipeline unconditionally — both in the workflow if-condition
and in trigger.ts. This wasted CI resources and API credits on reviews
without @claude mentions (e.g. plain "LGTM" reviews).

Workflow: add @claude check via contains() on comment.body and review.body.
Trigger validation: replace blind auto-trigger with payload-aware check
that inspects available body fields, falling back only when no body exists.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

.forgejo/workflows/claude.yml

@@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ jobs:
     #     despite action being 'labeled'). Let all through; trigger.ts validates.
     if: >-
       (github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && contains(github.event.comment.body, '@claude')) ||
-      (github.event_name == 'pull_request_review_comment' || github.event_name == 'pull_request_comment') ||
+      (github.event_name == 'pull_request_review_comment' || github.event_name == 'pull_request_comment') &&
+        (contains(github.event.comment.body, '@claude') || contains(github.event.review.body, '@claude')) ||
       (github.event_name == 'pull_request_review' && contains(github.event.review.body, '@claude')) ||
       (github.event_name == 'issues')
     runs-on: grunt

src/github/validation/trigger.ts

@@ -123,32 +123,37 @@ export function checkContainsTrigger(context: ParsedGitHubContext): boolean {
     isIssueCommentEvent(context) ||
     isPullRequestReviewCommentEvent(context)
   ) {
-    // Forgejo's pull_request_review_comment payload does NOT include a
+    // Forgejo sends both review comments and full reviews as
-    // top-level `comment` object (it's undefined).  On Forgejo, the
+    // `pull_request_comment`, which normalizes to `pull_request_review_comment`.
-    // workflow `if:` already gates on event name alone, so always trigger
+    // The payload may have `comment.body`, `review.body`, both, or neither.
-    // here — the actual comment data is fetched via REST in the data
+    // Try all available body fields before giving up.
-    // fetcher, and non-matching comments won't produce useful output.
+    const payload = context.payload as Record<string, any>;
-    if (
-      isPullRequestReviewCommentEvent(context) &&
-      detectPlatform() === "forgejo"
-    ) {
-      console.log(
-        "Forgejo pull_request_review_comment: triggering (payload lacks comment body)",
-      );
-      return true;
-    }
-
     const commentBody = isIssueCommentEvent(context)
       ? context.payload.comment.body
-      : context.payload.comment.body;
+      : (payload.comment?.body ?? payload.review?.body ?? "");
+
     // Check for exact match with word boundaries or punctuation
     const regex = new RegExp(
       `(^|\\s)${escapeRegExp(triggerPhrase)}([\\s.,!?;:]|$)`,
     );
-    if (regex.test(commentBody)) {
+    if (commentBody && regex.test(commentBody)) {
       console.log(`Comment contains exact trigger phrase '${triggerPhrase}'`);
       return true;
     }
+
+    // On Forgejo, if no body was found in the payload at all, still trigger —
+    // the actual comment data will be fetched via REST in the data fetcher.
+    // This handles edge cases where Forgejo strips body from the webhook payload.
+    if (
+      isPullRequestReviewCommentEvent(context) &&
+      detectPlatform() === "forgejo" &&
+      !commentBody
+    ) {
+      console.log(
+        "Forgejo pull_request_review_comment: no body in payload, triggering (data fetched via REST)",
+      );
+      return true;
+    }
   }
 
   console.log(`No trigger was met for ${triggerPhrase}`);